# 5.4: Sheria ya Coulomb

- Page ID
- 176026

Mwishoni mwa sehemu hii, utaweza:

- Eleza nguvu ya umeme, wote kwa ubora na kwa kiasi kikubwa
- Mahesabu ya nguvu kwamba mashtaka exert juu ya kila mmoja
- Kuamua mwelekeo wa nguvu za umeme kwa mashtaka tofauti ya chanzo
- Eleza kwa usahihi na kutumia kanuni ya superposition kwa mashtaka mengi ya chanzo

Majaribio ya mashtaka ya umeme yameonyesha kwamba ikiwa vitu viwili kila mmoja vina malipo ya umeme, basi hutumia nguvu za umeme kwa kila mmoja. Ukubwa wa nguvu ni sawa sawa na malipo ya wavu kwenye kila kitu na inversely sawia na mraba wa umbali kati yao. (Kushangaza, nguvu haitegemei wingi wa vitu.) Mwelekeo wa vector nguvu ni pamoja na mstari wa kufikiri kujiunga na vitu viwili na inatajwa na ishara za mashtaka yaliyohusika.

Hebu

- \(q_1, q_2 =\)malipo ya umeme ya vitu viwili;
- \(\vec{r}_{12} =\)vector makazi yao kutoka\(q_1\) kwa\(q_2\).

Nguvu ya umeme\(\vec{F}\) kwenye moja ya mashtaka ni sawa na ukubwa wa malipo yake mwenyewe na ukubwa wa malipo mengine, na ni inversely sawia na mraba wa umbali kati yao:

\[F \propto \dfrac{q_1q_2}{r_{12}^2}.\]

Uwiano huu unakuwa usawa na kuanzishwa kwa mara kwa mara ya uwiano. Kwa sababu ambayo itakuwa wazi katika sura ya baadaye, uwiano mara kwa mara kwamba sisi kutumia ni kweli ukusanyaji wa constants. (Sisi kujadili hii mara kwa mara muda mfupi.)

Ukubwa wa nguvu ya umeme (au **Coulomb nguvu**) kati ya chembe mbili za kushtakiwa umeme ni sawa na

\[\left|\mathbf{F}_{12}\right|=\frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon_{0}} \frac{\left|q_{1} q_{2}\right|}{r_{12}^{2}} \label{Coulomb}\]

Vector kitengo\(r\) ina ukubwa wa 1 na pointi kando ya mhimili kama mashtaka. Ikiwa mashtaka yana ishara sawa, nguvu iko katika mwelekeo sawa na\(r\) kuonyesha nguvu ya kupindua. Ikiwa mashtaka yana ishara tofauti, nguvu iko kinyume cha\(r\) kuonyesha nguvu ya kuvutia. (Kielelezo\(\PageIndex{1}\)).

It is important to note that the electric force is not constant; it is a function of the separation distance between the two charges. If either the test charge or the source charge (or both) move, then \(\vec{r}\) changes, and therefore so does the force. An immediate consequence of this is that direct application of Newton’s laws with this force can be mathematically difficult, depending on the specific problem at hand. It can (usually) be done, but we almost always look for easier methods of calculating whatever physical quantity we are interested in. (Conservation of energy is the most common choice.)

Finally, the new constant \(\epsilon_0\) in Coulomb’s law is called the ** permittivity of free space**, or (better) the permittivity of vacuum. It has a very important physical meaning that we will discuss in a later chapter; for now, it is simply an empirical proportionality constant. Its numerical value (to three significant figures) turns out to be

\[\epsilon_0 = 8.85 \times 10^{-12} \dfrac{C^2}{N \cdot m^2}.\]

These units are required to give the force in Coulomb’s law the correct units of newtons. Note that in Coulomb’s law, the permittivity of vacuum is only part of the proportionality constant. For convenience, we often define a Coulomb’s constant:

\[k_e = \dfrac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} = 8.99 \times 10^9 \dfrac{N \cdot m^2}{C^2}.\]

A hydrogen atom consists of a single proton and a single electron. The proton has a charge of \(+e\) and the electron has \(-e\). In the “ground state” of the atom, the electron orbits the proton at most probable distance of \(5.29 \times 10^{-11} m\) (Figure \(\PageIndex{2}\)). Calculate the electric force on the electron due to the proton.

**Strategy**

For the purposes of this example, we are treating the electron and proton as two point particles, each with an electric charge, and we are told the distance between them; we are asked to calculate the force on the electron. We thus use Coulomb’s law (Equation \ref{Coulomb}).

**Solution**

Our two charges are,

\[\begin{align*} q_1 &= +e \\[4pt] &= +1.602 \times 10^{-19} C \\[4pt] q_2 &= -e \\[4pt] &= -1.602 \times 10^{-19} C \end{align*}\]

and the distance between them

\[r = 5.29 \times 10^{-11} m. \nonumber\]

The magnitude of the force on the electron (Equation \ref{Coulomb}) is

\[\begin{align*} F &= \dfrac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}\dfrac{|q_1q_2|}{r_{12}^2} \\[4pt] &= \dfrac{1}{4\pi \left(8.85 \times 10^{-12} \frac{C^2}{N \cdot m^2} \right)} \dfrac{(1.602 \times 10^{-19} C)^2}{(5.29 \times 10^{-11} m)^2} \\[4pt] &= 8.25 \times 10^{-8} \end{align*}\]

As for the direction, since the charges on the two particles are opposite, the force is attractive; the force on the electron points radially directly toward the proton, everywhere in the electron’s orbit. The force is thus expressed as

\[\vec{F} = (8.25 \times 10^{-8} N) \hat{r}. \nonumber\]

**Significance**

This is a three-dimensional system, so the electron (and therefore the force on it) can be anywhere in an imaginary spherical shell around the proton. In this “classical” model of the hydrogen atom, the electrostatic force on the electron points in the inward centripetal direction, thus maintaining the electron’s orbit. But note that the quantum mechanical model of hydrogen (discussed in Quantum Mechanics) is utterly different.

What would be different if the electron also had a positive charge?

**Answer**-
The force would point outward.

## Multiple Source Charges

The analysis that we have done for two particles can be extended to an arbitrary number of particles; we simply repeat the analysis, two charges at a time. Specifically, we ask the question: Given **N** charges (which we refer to as source charge), what is the net electric force that they exert on some other point charge (which we call the test charge)? Note that we use these terms because we can think of the test charge being used to test the strength of the force provided by the source charges.

Like all forces that we have seen up to now, the net electric force on our test charge is simply the vector sum of each individual electric force exerted on it by each of the individual test charges. Thus, we can calculate the net force on the test charge **Q** by calculating the force on it from each source charge, taken one at a time, and then adding all those forces together (as vectors). This ability to simply add up individual forces in this way is referred to as the **principle of superposition**, and is one of the more important features of the electric force. In mathematical form, this becomes

\[\vec{F}(r) = \dfrac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} Q \sum_{i=1}^N \dfrac{q_i}{r_i^2}\hat{r}_i^2. \label{sup}\]

In this expression, **Q** represents the charge of the particle that is experiencing the electric force \(\vec{F}\), and is located at \(\vec{r}\) from the origin; the \(q_i's\) are the **N** source charges, and the vectors \(\vec{r}_i = r_i \hat{r}_i\) are the displacements from the position of the **i**th charge to the position of \(Q\). Each of the **N** unit vectors points directly from its associated source charge toward the test charge. All of this is depicted in Figure \(\PageIndex{2}\). Please note that there is no physical difference between **Q** and \(q_i\); the difference in labels is merely to allow clear discussion, with **Q** being the charge we are determining the force on.

(Note that the force vector \(\vec{F}_i\) does not necessarily point in the same direction as the unit vector \(\hat{r}_i\); it may point in the opposite direction, \(-\hat{r}_i\). The signs of the source charge and test charge determine the direction of the force on the test charge.)

There is a complication, however. Just as the source charges each exert a force on the test charge, so too (by Newton’s third law) does the test charge exert an equal and opposite force on each of the source charges. As a consequence, each source charge would change position. However, by Equation \ref{Coulomb}, the force on the test charge is a function of position; thus, as the positions of the source charges change, the net force on the test charge necessarily changes, which changes the force, which again changes the positions. Thus, the entire mathematical analysis quickly becomes intractable. Later, we will learn techniques for handling this situation, but for now, we make the simplifying assumption that the source charges are fixed in place somehow, so that their positions are constant in time. (The test charge is allowed to move.) With this restriction in place, the analysis of charges is known as **electrostatics**, where “statics” refers to the constant (that is, static) positions of the source charges and the force is referred to as an **electrostatic force**.

Three different, small charged objects are placed as shown in Figure \(\PageIndex{2}\). The charges \(q_1\) and \(q_3\) are fixed in place; \(q_2\) is free to move. Given \(q_1 = 2e, \, q_2 = -3e\), and \(q_3 = -5e\), and that \(d = 2.0 \times 10^{-7} m\), what is the net force on the middle charge \(q_2\)?

**Strategy**

We use Coulomb’s law again. The way the question is phrased indicates that \(q_2\) is our test charge, so that \(q_1\) and \(q_3\) are source charges. The principle of superposition says that the force on \(q_2\) from each of the other charges is unaffected by the presence of the other charge. Therefore, we write down the force on \(q_2\) from each and add them together as vectors.

**Solution**

We have two source charges \(q_1\) and \(q_3\) a test charge \(q_2\), distances \(r_{21}\) and \(r_{23}\) and we are asked to find a force. This calls for Coulomb’s law and superposition of forces. There are two forces:

\[\begin{align*} \vec{F} &= \vec{F}_{21} + \vec{F}_{23} = \dfrac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}\left[\dfrac{q_2q_1}{r_{21}^2}\hat{j} + \left(-\dfrac{q_2q_3}{r_{23}^2}\hat{i}\right)\right]. \end{align*}\]

We cannot add these forces directly because they don’t point in the same direction: \(\vec{F}_{12}\) points only in the −**x**-direction, while \(\vec{F}_{13}\) points only in the +**y**-direction. The net force is obtained from applying the Pythagorean theorem to its **x**- and **y**-components:

\[F = \sqrt{F_x^2 + F_y^2} \nonumber\]

and

\[\begin{align*} F_x &= -F_{23} = -\dfrac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \dfrac{q_2q_3}{r_{23}^2} \\[4pt] &= - \left(8.99 \times 10^9 \dfrac{N\cdot m^2}{C^2}\right) \dfrac{(4.806 \times 10^{-19} C)(8.01 \times 10^{-19}C)}{(4.00 \times 10^{-7}m)^2} \\[4pt] &= -2.16 \times 10^{-14} \, N\end{align*}\]

and

\[\begin{align*}F_y &= F_{21} = \dfrac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \dfrac{q_2q_1}{r_{21}} \\[4pt] &= \left(9.99 \times 10^9 \dfrac{N \cdot m^2}{C^2}\right) \dfrac{(4.806 \times 10^{-19}C)(3.204 \times 10^{-19}C)}{(2.00 \times 10^{-7} m)^2} \\[4pt] &= 3.46 \times 10^{-14} \, N.\end{align*}\]

We find that

\[\begin{align*} F &= \sqrt{F_x^2 + F_y^2} \\[4pt] &= 4.08 \times 10^{-14} \, N \end{align*}\]

at an angle of

\[\begin{align*} \phi &= \tan^{-1} \left(\dfrac{F_y}{F_x}\right) \\[4pt] &= \tan^{-1} \left( \dfrac{3.46 \times 10^{-14} N}{-2.16 \times 10^{-14}N} \right) \\[4pt] &= -58^o, \end{align*}\]

that is, \(58^o\) above the −**x**-axis, as shown in the diagram.

**Significance**

Notice that when we substituted the numerical values of the charges, we did not include the negative sign of either \(q_1\) or \(q_3\). Recall that negative signs on vector quantities indicate a reversal of direction of the vector in question. But for electric forces, the direction of the force is determined by the types (signs) of both interacting charges; we determine the force directions by considering whether the signs of the two charges are the same or are opposite. If you also include negative signs from negative charges when you substitute numbers, you run the risk of mathematically reversing the direction of the force you are calculating. Thus, the safest thing to do is to calculate just the magnitude of the force, using the absolute values of the charges, and determine the directions physically.

It’s also worth noting that the only new concept in this example is how to calculate the electric forces; everything else (getting the net force from its components, breaking the forces into their components, finding the direction of the net force) is the same as force problems you have done earlier.

What would be different in Example \(\PageIndex{2}\) if \(q_1\) were negative rather than positive?

**Answer**-
The net force would point \(58^o\) below the −

**x**-axis.